Thinking Under Constraint

Constraint is not an inconvenience. It is information.

Systems become grounded when constraints are explicit and inescapable. They become fragile when constraints are softened, deferred, or replaced with narrative assurances.

Thinking under constraint means accepting that:

• resources are finite
• conditions change
• information is incomplete
• consequences are real

This describes a relationship to reality: real systems, not abstract ones.

In real systems, failures surface immediately, trade-offs cannot be postponed, and correctness is not negotiable. Constraint forces clarity. Pretending becomes expensive. Judgment matters.

Much of the work documented here is an attempt to preserve this relationship to constraint inside modern software systems, where abstraction often hides cost, responsibility, and failure until it is too late.

Next:

• Fieldcraft vs Factory Thinking
  Why many technical problems are treated as factory work despite being field problems.

• Back To Home
  Return to the main page.

Previous:

• Abstraction, Indirection, and Accountability
  On when abstraction earns its place and when it becomes insulation.