Divergent Work Is Legitimate
Divergent work is often tolerated but rarely respected.
This is not because it is ineffective, but because it resists easy measurement. Non-linear progress, context switching, and delayed synthesis are difficult to supervise and easy to misclassify as inconsistency.
In this kind of work, short periods of high-intensity focus can produce as much progress as much longer periods of routine, well-defined execution. When evaluation relies primarily on visible activity, steady cadence, or hours logged, this progress is easy to misread or dismissed entirely.
Divergent work is not optimized for throughput. It is optimized for:
- uncertain problem spaces
- conceptual compression
- boundary discovery
- deep synthesis over time
These are precisely the conditions under which new models, architectures, and coherent designs emerge.
This project treats divergent work as a legitimate and serious way of thinking, not as a deviation that must justify itself against factory expectations. Rigor is preserved through constraints, explicit reasoning, and eventual commitment, not through constant visible motion.
Next:
- Back To Home
Return to the main page.
Previous:
- Seriousness, Play, and Human Cognition
Why excessive dryness becomes self sabotage, and why humor and warmth are functional.